plus addressing over lmtp not working / sam [box] anyone p set
Lan Tran
llt at recol.com
Wed Dec 3 10:15:03 EST 2008
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alain Spineux" <aspineux at gmail.com>
To: <spamtest-eir1beucei at asp4.polyformal.de>
Cc: <info-cyrus at lists.andrew.cmu.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 2:03 AM
Subject: Re: plus addressing over lmtp not working / sam [box] anyone p set
>I made multiple comments , look carefully
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Stefan Pampel
> <spamtest-eir1beucei at asp4.polyformal.de> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Alain Spineux <aspineux at gmail.com> schrieb:
>>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Stefan Pampel
>>><spamtest-eir1beucei at asp4.polyformal.de> wrote:
>>>> it seems that plus addressing not work in my case:
>>>>
>>>> postfix configured correctly:
>>>> main.cf:
>>>> recipient_delimiter = +
>>>>
>>>> master.cf:
>>>> lmtp unix - - n - - lmtp
>>>>
>>>> Mails basically reach the INBOX, but not the folder itself
>>>>
>>>> cyrus config:
>>>> <snip>
>>>> altnamespace: yes # even with no does not work
>>>> virtdomains: userid
>>>> defaultdomain: foo.bar.org
>>>> unixhierarchysep: no
>>>> </snip>
>>>>
>>>> The folder
>>>> lam user.user1.spam
>>>>
>>>> user1 lrswipcda
>>>> anyone p
>>>>
>>>> The mail header contains
>>>> To: user1 <user1+spam at foo.bar.org>
>>>>
>>>> Any hints?
>>>
>>> Does the email goes in the user INBOX at least ?
>>
>> Yes, it goes to the INBOX, the header of the recieived mail looks like
>> this
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> Return-Path: <foobar at gmail.com>
>> Received: from foo.org ([unix socket])
>> by foo.org (Cyrus v2.2.13-Debian-2.2.13-14+b3) with LMTPA;
>> Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:44:21 +0100
>> X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
>> Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
>> by foo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B24EF4D11
>> for <user at foo.org>; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:44:21 +0100 (CET)
>> X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at
>> X-Spam-Flag: NO
>> X-Spam-Score: -0.001
>> X-Spam-Level:
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31
>> tests=[SPF_PASS=-0.001]
>> Received: from foo.org ([127.0.0.1])
>> by localhost (foo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
>> with LMTP id ggSVa5nIr8Oq for <user at foo.org>;
>
> The problem is just here, above
>
>> Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:44:20 +0100 (CET)
>> Received: from mail-qy0-f21.google.com (mail-qy0-f21.google.com
>> [209.85.221.21])
>> by foo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DEDE01D5A
>> for <user+spam at foo.org>; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:44:20 +0100 (CET)
>
> Because it was still "user+spam" here !
>
>> Received: by qyk14 with SMTP id 14so3861085qyk.11
>> for <user+spam at foo.org>; Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:44:19 -0800 (PST)
>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>> d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
>> h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
>> :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
>> :content-disposition;
>> bh=OsY01wpTsRs9wg12b8CJsXpNhhRKn9VYCZ0l9cxhl5Q=;
>>
>> b=h9NS27DnBzXhMGBpPICUp2U5tEwgbn+ouAhGLuYteBJnMWw5hIQ4vj+d8bNn8TzV4E
>>
>> DNtPqxGU0QXa55JsPSjYZU4yZyCk5kA1oCNacatnsWRY2LvrVtdUS7spqAYZWNpxsXas
>> z78A3NBawCutspEj0pOlUbfwNLDDrnjK20Ce8=
>> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
>> d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
>> h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type
>> :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
>>
>> b=dvgd4c6c5TbTVmP0TibQyKDSpojbNRDZTIbmWt5DV9TMvTfdHmBtxL+564/pci7phD
>>
>> 4knxRl2MUb483WxZJcKazltQuT5+WtoxN0Ljg2xtqGEc+EijyG9NMCno/CtQSIA82Mg+
>> FWG33nCiGc/cAxhGSQo+oe0LMtap+BZVHYNIM=
>> Received: by 10.214.183.9 with SMTP id g9mr12118283qaf.35.1228247059060;
>> Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:44:19 -0800 (PST)
>> Received: by 10.214.182.8 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:44:19 -0800 (PST)
>> Message-ID: <fe5446ec0812021144o6d3270b7x372ae0cdbc7cec5 at mail.gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:44:19 +0100
>> From: "Stefan Pampel" <foobar at gmail.com>
>> To: user <user+spam at foo.org>
>> Subject: 123
>>
>> </snip>
>>
>>> Did you look into the lmtpd.log and postfix.log to check if the
>>> delivery looks ok .?
>>
>> too me it looks ok.
>>
>> <snip>
>> Dec 2 20:44:19 asp4 postfix/smtpd[6073]: connect from
>> mail-qy0-f21.google.com[209.85.221.21]
>> Dec 2 20:44:20 asp4 postfix/smtpd[6073]: 53DEDE01D5A:
>> client=mail-qy0-f21.google.com[209.85.221.21]
>> Dec 2 20:44:20 asp4 postfix/cleanup[6076]: 53DEDE01D5A:
>> message-id=<fe5446ec0812021144o6d3270b7x372ae0cdbc7cec5 at mail.gmail.com>
>> Dec 2 20:44:20 asp4 postfix/qmgr[2392]: 53DEDE01D5A:
>> from=<foobar at gmail.com>, size=2214, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
>> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 postfix/smtpd[6081]: connect from unknown[127.0.0.1]
>> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 postfix/smtpd[6081]: D0B24EF4D11:
>> client=unknown[127.0.0.1]
>> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 postfix/cleanup[6076]: D0B24EF4D11:
>> message-id=<fe5446ec0812021144o6d3270b7x372ae0cdbc7cec5 at mail.gmail.com>
>> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 postfix/smtpd[6081]: disconnect from
>> unknown[127.0.0.1]
>> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 postfix/qmgr[2392]: D0B24EF4D11:
>> from=<foobar at gmail.com>, size=2816, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
>> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 cyrus/lmtpunix[6070]: accepted connection
>> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 cyrus/lmtpunix[6070]: lmtp connection preauth'd as
>> postman
>> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 cyrus/master[6083]: about to exec
>> /usr/lib/cyrus/bin/lmtpd
>> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 cyrus/lmtpunix[6083]: executed
>> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 amavis[17280]: (17280-18) Passed CLEAN,
>> [209.85.221.21] [209.85.221.21] <foobar at gmail.com> -> <user at foo.org>,
>> Message-ID: <fe5446ec0812021144o6d3270b7x372ae0cdbc7cec5 at mail.gmail.com>,
>> mail_id: ggSVa5nIr8Oq, Hits: -0.001, size: 2214, queued_as: D0B24EF4D11,
>> 1298 m
>> s
>> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 postfix/lmtp[6077]: 53DEDE01D5A: to=<user at foo.org>,
>> orig_to=<user+spam at foo.org>, relay=127.0.0.1
>> [127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=1.7, delays=0.39/0/0/1.3, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent
>> (250 2.0.0 Ok, id=17280-18, from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok:
>> queued a
>
> HERE is the "culprit" ! postfix tell us, it got "user+spam" and give
> back "user" to [127.0.0.1]:10024 !
>
> Does it mean amavis and postfix use LMTP protocol ? This is unusual !
> (but this is not the probleme)
>
>> s D0B24EF4D11)
>> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 postfix/qmgr[2392]: 53DEDE01D5A: removed
>>
>> </snip>
>>
>> best regards
>>
>> Stefan Pampel
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iEYEARECAAYFAkk1k6AACgkQXXT1nfS2Z+GcFwCgr0iakn99Six0GbcxHnwYeVBQ
>> 4OYAnidQaOIP+PPfxxtV7/jmiDnYunrd
>> =jp7p
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>> --
>> / polyformal /
>> | http://www.polyformal.de /
>> |_________________________/
>> GPG KEY: 11678845
>>
amavisd-new by default does not have plus addressing enabled. Add or
uncomment this line to amavisd.conf and reload it:
$recipient_delimiter = '+';
LT
More information about the Info-cyrus
mailing list