LIST is slow for 35K mailboxes

[Ian G Batten]

On 09 Oct 07, at 1522, Blake Hudson wrote:
>>
>> Sorry this doesn't help solve your problem but it proves it should
>> be a lot faster than that.
>>
>> Joseph Brennan
>> Columbia University Information Technology
>>
>>
> Could database type differences (or contention) be an issue here? What
> database format are each of you using?

We're using Berkeley.  We tried skiplist a few years ago, but we saw  
occasional problems with it and switched back.  I'll try skiplist now...

ian