Cyrus Patches used at FastMail.FM
murch at andrew.cmu.edu
Tue May 23 14:55:48 EDT 2006
Robert Mueller wrote:
>> Cool, some of the patches look really interesting and I'm considering to
>> include one or the other into my rpm packages. For example the
>> patch seems very nice. Just to be sure, are there any license
>> on the patches?
> No, no license restrictions. We'd love these to get back into cyrus
> itself, so happy to contribute them back to whatever licence cyrus is
> The statuscache is actually very useful, more so than Bron's comment on
> the page immediately suggests. Originally I thought it was our webmail
> client that was doing most of the status calls, so I actually put
> caching into our web client. It turned out that in fact lots of email
> clients also blast the IMAP server with status calls, so putting it in
> the server itself has made a noticeable difference to load on our servers.
I know we discussed this in the past, but I can't seem to find the
thread. What part of the existing STATUS code causes the bottleneck?
Is it STATUS_RECENT and STATUS_UNSEEN?
Project Cyrus Developer/Maintainer
Carnegie Mellon University
More information about the Info-cyrus