xa87n at yahoo.com
Sun Mar 12 19:15:52 EST 2006
Ken Murchison <murch at andrew.cmu.edu> wrote: Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:
> Quoting Scott Russell :
>> Can anyone comment on how the cyrus-imapd 2.3.3-1 RPM is working for
>> them? I remember there were some stability problems in imapd after
>> 2.3.1-3 which was tracking CVS bug fixes and it was recommended to
>> back down to 2.3.1-2. I'm not sure what became of those reports or if
>> they have resurfaced again under 2.3.3-1.
> I had it installed on couple of testing boxes. It worked OK for
> "single-server" installation. However, cluster (Murder) type of
> installation was unusable. The mupdate process would just suck CPU and
> get stuck eventually. I've wrote about this problem on the list, and it
> seems at least one more person hit the same problem (see the thread with
> subject "cyrus murder, mupdate sucking up CPU"). I also opened bugzilla
> entry (bug# 2806). I had same problem with all 2.3.x that were released
> so far.
I've verified that a problem exists in mupdate due to some code changes
that I made in prot_select(). I haven't fixed it yet, but I'm working
on it (debugging threaded code sucks).
Thank you. I just wanted to say that I was seeing this as well, for weeks, and have been trying to narrow it down (before writing to list to ask), making mostly system changes. I was wondering, later on, if there would be a patch for 2.2.12, we cannot upgrade yet to 2.3 because we need to upgrade backend first.
Take care guys,
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Info-cyrus