cyrus-imapd 2.3.3-1

Mark xa87n at yahoo.com
Sun Mar 12 19:15:52 EST 2006



Ken Murchison <murch at andrew.cmu.edu> wrote: Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:
> Quoting Scott Russell :
> 
>> Can anyone comment on how the cyrus-imapd 2.3.3-1 RPM is working for 
>> them? I remember there were some stability problems in imapd after 
>> 2.3.1-3 which was tracking CVS bug fixes and it was recommended to 
>> back down to 2.3.1-2. I'm not sure what became of those reports or if 
>> they have resurfaced again under 2.3.3-1.
> 
> 
> I had it installed on couple of testing boxes.  It worked OK for 
> "single-server" installation.  However, cluster (Murder) type of 
> installation was unusable.  The mupdate process would just suck CPU and 
> get stuck eventually.  I've wrote about this problem on the list, and it 
> seems at least one more person hit the same problem (see the thread with 
> subject "cyrus murder, mupdate sucking up CPU").  I also opened bugzilla 
> entry (bug# 2806).  I had same problem with all 2.3.x that were released 
> so far.

I've verified that a problem exists in mupdate due to some code changes 
that I made in prot_select().  I haven't fixed it yet, but I'm working 
on it (debugging threaded code sucks).

 
 Thank you. I just wanted to say that I was seeing this as well, for weeks, and have been trying to narrow it down (before writing to list to ask), making mostly system changes. I was wondering, later on, if there would be a patch for 2.2.12, we cannot upgrade yet to 2.3 because we need to upgrade backend first.
 Take care guys,
 
 Mike
 

		
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail  makes sharing a breeze. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/private/info-cyrus/attachments/20060312/ffe10fd2/attachment-0001.html


More information about the Info-cyrus mailing list