improving concurrency/performance
Jure Pečar
pegasus at nerv.eu.org
Sun Nov 6 06:51:33 EST 2005
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 03:58:15 -0200
Sergio Devojno Bruder <bruder at haxent.com.br> wrote:
> In our experience FS-wise, ReiserFS is the worst performer between ext3,
> XFS e ReiserFS (with tailBLAH turned on or off) for a Cyrus Backend (>1M
> mailboxes in 3 partitions per backend, 0.5TB each partition).
Interesting ... can you provide some numbers, even from memory?
I always thought that reiserfs is best suited for jobs like this. Also, I'm
quite happy with it, but I havent done any hard-core scientific
measurements.
--
Jure Pečar
http://jure.pecar.org/
More information about the Info-cyrus
mailing list