Funding Cyrus High Availability

Derrick J Brashear shadow at
Sat Sep 18 21:20:24 EDT 2004

On Sat, 18 Sep 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:

>> I'm not sure that IMAP is ameniable to active-active: the prevalence of 
>> UIDs in the protocol means that it would be very hard to resolve the 
>> inconsistencies that would occur if a pair of machines ever lost touch.
> Right, I was assuming that active-passive is what we would probably get, I 
> was just taking the pulse of the community.

In the past I have attempted to steer things internally at work toward 
active-active solutions, but I think expecting that here will result in an 
unrealistically complex solution to deploy, if implemented.
Cyrus Home Page:
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ:
List Archives/Info:

More information about the Info-cyrus mailing list