saslauthd+pam+pam_ldap VS saslauthd+ldap

[Igor Brezac]

On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Wang Penghui wrote:

> Simon Matter wrote:
>
> >The only problem I see with pam_ldap is with the cyrus-imapd virtual
> >domains. AFAIK it doesn't work for more than one domain because PAM
> >doesn't know about realms.
> >
> >
> I have got your mean, if i want to add the virtual domains support to
> cyrus-imapd,
> I have no choice to use saslauthd -a ldap.
> But in the condition of only one domain, the pam auth is more flexible.
>

saslauthd+ldap is much faster and it does not require you to use posix
schema for user entries.

-- 
Igor
---
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html