followup: stuck lmtpd processes

[Etienne Goyer]

Sorry, I will have to wait til 2.1.16 to test it.  I can't just plug the
fud.c from CVS and compile it, and I am really too busy these day to
make a full checkout from CVS and test it.

I'll report my experience with 2.1.16, if and when it come out.
 
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:24:11PM -0400, Etienne Goyer wrote:
> Thanks.  I'll test it by the end of the week, and report.
> 
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:18:12PM -0400, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Etienne Goyer wrote:
> > 
> > > > I'll work on fixing fud shortly (its using signal() and it should be
> > > > using sigaction()).
> > >
> > > The included patch against 2.1.13 work for me.
> > 
> > This sort of thing won't work for file locking.  I've just committed a
> > patch to fud that uses sigaction() [Which since we're assuming POSIX
> > anyway, should hopefully be enough].
> > 
> > -Rob
> > 
> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > Rob Siemborski * Andrew Systems Group * Cyert Hall 207 * 412-268-7456
> > Research Systems Programmer * /usr/contributed Gatekeeper
> 
> -- 
> Etienne Goyer                    Linux Québec Technologies Inc.
> http://www.LinuxQuebec.com       etienne.goyer at linuxquebec.com

-- 
Etienne Goyer                    Linux Québec Technologies Inc.
http://www.LinuxQuebec.com       etienne.goyer at linuxquebec.com