Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

[Per Steinar Iversen]

On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Ken Murchison wrote:

> The obvious difference here is that Cyrus 2.1 supports the IDLE
> extension and Outlook is using it.  I'm not sure why the client would be
> IDLEing in between APPENDs, but I've grown accustomed to seeing silly
> behavior from Outlook and Netscape.  What method for IDLE did you
> configure with? (doing a 'version' command in cyradm will tell us
> everything we need).  You might want to try reconfiguring/recompiling
> Cyrus using --with-idle=no and see if this makes a difference.
> 
> Ken


I use the very nice RPM found at http://home.teleport.ch/simix/ :

name       : Cyrus IMAPD
version    : v2.1.12-Invoca-RPM-2.1.12-1 2003/02/03 20:43:58
vendor     : Project Cyrus
support-url: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
os         : Linux
os-version : 2.4.18-24.8.0smp
environment: Cyrus SASL 2.1.12
             Sleepycat Software: Berkeley DB 4.0.14: (November 18, 2001)
             OpenSSL 0.9.6b [engine] 9 Jul 2001
             CMU Sieve 2.2
             TCP Wrappers
             mmap = shared
             lock = fcntl
             nonblock = fcntl
             auth = unix
             idle = poll
             mboxlist.db = skiplist
             subs.db = flat
             seen.db = skiplist
             duplicate.db = db3-nosync
             tls.db = db3-nosync

I will try to build version where IDLE is turned off.

-psi