Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

[Per Steinar Iversen]

On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Per Steinar Iversen wrote:

> On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Ken Murchison wrote:
> 
> > The obvious difference here is that Cyrus 2.1 supports the IDLE
> > extension and Outlook is using it.  I'm not sure why the client would be
> > IDLEing in between APPENDs, but I've grown accustomed to seeing silly
> > behavior from Outlook and Netscape.  What method for IDLE did you
> > configure with? (doing a 'version' command in cyradm will tell us
> > everything we need).  You might want to try reconfiguring/recompiling
> > Cyrus using --with-idle=no and see if this makes a difference.
> > 
> > Ken
> 
> 
> I use the very nice RPM found at http://home.teleport.ch/simix/ :
> 
> name       : Cyrus IMAPD
> version    : v2.1.12-Invoca-RPM-2.1.12-1 2003/02/03 20:43:58
> vendor     : Project Cyrus
> support-url: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
> os         : Linux
> os-version : 2.4.18-24.8.0smp
> environment: Cyrus SASL 2.1.12
>              Sleepycat Software: Berkeley DB 4.0.14: (November 18, 2001)
>              OpenSSL 0.9.6b [engine] 9 Jul 2001
>              CMU Sieve 2.2
>              TCP Wrappers
>              mmap = shared
>              lock = fcntl
>              nonblock = fcntl
>              auth = unix
>              idle = poll
>              mboxlist.db = skiplist
>              subs.db = flat
>              seen.db = skiplist
>              duplicate.db = db3-nosync
>              tls.db = db3-nosync
> 
> I will try to build version where IDLE is turned off.

I checked now and it is really IDLE that confuses Outlook. The mail copies
without any problems now that IDLE is disabled.

-psi