PostgreSQL backend: a waste of time?

[Phil Brutsche]

Noll Janos wrote:
> Hy!
> 
>  I think that's a very good idea, but we found that MySQL is much faster
> than Postgres, when there are no complex queries (this is the case here),
> so it might be a better idea to use MySQL.

Or better yet, support both.

Some people already use a SQL database (Postgres, in my case) and don't want 
to waste time trying to learn & set up another.

A weird, maybe even stupid idea: if Nicola is going to "port" the patch to 
another database, port it to unixODBC.

-- 

Phil Brutsche
phil at optimumdata.com