From scott.tetrick at intel.com Fri Oct 28 14:46:55 2005 From: scott.tetrick at intel.com (Tetrick, Scott) Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:46:55 -0700 Subject: [Disksim-users] runvalid produces funny answers Message-ID: Has this been always the case? Latest version of DISKsim 3.0 from the website, and after I get it to compile, both on CYGWIN on windows and Redhat with 2.4.9 kernel I get some significant differences. Are these differences known? Is there a fix, either in runvalid or in the code? The remaining tests exercise other DiskSim components Open synthetic workload (avg. resp. should be about 47.3ms) disksim_run_simulation(): simulated 1027642 events IOdriver Response time average: 10.951054 Closed synthetic workload (avg. resp. should be about 87.6ms) disksim_run_simulation(): simulated 571405 events IOdriver Response time average: 87.556034 Mixed synthetic workload (avg. resp. should be about 24.4ms) disksim_run_simulation(): simulated 1003645 events IOdriver Response time average: 35.156412 RAID 5 at device driver (avg. resp. should be about 22.8ms) disksim_run_simulation(): simulated 1938795 events IOdriver Response time average: 23.049301 Set of disk arrays at device driver (avg. resp. should be about 33.3ms) disksim_run_simulation(): simulated 1858042 events Overall I/O System Response time average: 34.214280 Memory cache at controller (avg. resp. should be about 23.0ms) disksim_run_simulation(): simulated 1340976 events IOdriver Response time average: 26.168707 Cache device managed at controller (avg. resp. should be about 27.4ms) disksim_run_simulation(): simulated 2105658 events IOdriver Response time average: 28.290840 Simpledisk instead of original model (avg. resp. should be about 13.5ms) disksim_run_simulation(): simulated 377019 events IOdriver Response time average: 13.875535 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: