[RFC PATCH v2] imapd.c: imapoptions: implement idle timeout

[ellie timoney]

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016, at 06:24 PM, Philipp Gesang wrote:
> Another reason is to preserve the old behavior by default. It
> might hit other users if the effect of the “timeout” is extended
> that way.
> 
> What about the middle ground? Cyrus could default to the
> “timeout” value unless “idletimeout” is positive.

That sounds pretty sane to me