SASL lib 2.1.24

[Torsten Schlabach]

Hi!

> Torsten,
> 
> GS2 depends on MIT version MIT Kerberos 1.9, which is not in Debian
> stable.
> I was able to build the gs2 module last night on testing.

I am quite ok if it doesn't build; I don't need it. Just want to make sure it does not *break* the build of the rest.

But seriously:

One may want to give the Debian packagers a heads-up about that new module. I guess it would have to become a separate binary package like

libsasl2-modules-gs2

which will then depend on

libk5crypto3
libkrb5-3
libkrb5support0 
(>= 1.9) 

Regards,
Torsten

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:49:30 -0500
> Von: Dan White <dwhite at olp.net>
> An: Torsten Schlabach <TSchlabach at gmx.net>
> CC: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>, cyrus-devel at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
> Betreff: Re: SASL lib 2.1.24

> On 14/04/11 16:15 +0200, Torsten Schlabach wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >But again, problem solved. So we now have a version in CVS which builds
> >without any additional patches including the LDAP module. My test build
> >did not include the gs2 module, I think, possibly because some
> >prerequisite is missing, but to me that is a detail of Debian packaging
> >then. I am still trying to understand what I would ever need GSSAPI and
> >GS2 for. I know what I need LDAP for.
> 
> Torsten,
> 
> GS2 depends on MIT version MIT Kerberos 1.9, which is not in Debian
> stable.
> I was able to build the gs2 module last night on testing.
> 
> >3. Pre-sort the list of currently 26 patches in the Debian package for
> >SASL lib 2.1.23 and identify those who are NOT Debian adjustments and
> >provide them for review (what format?)
> 
> Check out the Changelog around 2009-02-20. Alexey applied 4 Debian
> patches.
> 
> -- 
> Dan White