Add cyrus-devel list to Bugzilla bugs?

[Dave McMurtrie]

Dan White wrote:
> On 25/05/10 17:44 -0400, Dave McMurtrie wrote:
>> Bron Gondwana wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 05:22:55PM -0400, Matt Selsky wrote:
>>>> What do people think of having the cyrus-devel list CC'd on all new 
>>>> Bugzilla bugs?  This might increase awareness of bugs being filed 
>>>> and new patches being submitted.
>>>>
>>>> At the moment, new bugs are only seen directly by Ken (thought 
>>>> everyone else has access).
>>>
>>> Fantastic idea.  If there are enough people who don't like it, then we
>>> can always have a separate list - but we need something like that.
>>
>> Agreed.  I'll put this on my todo list and take care of it tomorrow.  
>> I'll hazard a guess that I'll spend 45 minutes staring at the 
>> bugzilla  web interface before I finally end up manually editing the 
>> backend  database to accomplish this.  If anyone actually knows how to 
>> do this  and would like to save me some time (and sanity) please let 
>> me know.
> 
> Dave,
> 
> Look for useqacontact.
>

First, thanks for saving me a ton of time, Dan.  useqacontact was set to 
"off", and I changed that so it's now on.

I noticed that pretty much every component of the Cyrus IMAP product 
already had a QA Contact defined as cyrus-bugzilla at lists.andrew.cmu.edu, 
which would, as the address implies, be delivered to the cyrus-bugzilla 
list.

The archives of this list show that some amount of mail was already 
being sent there, but if useqacontact does what it's documented to do, 
this list should now begin getting a lot more mail.

Is everyone okay with just keeping things the way they are configured 
now, assuming that the mail is actually being sent out, or would you 
rather I change the QA contact to be cyrus-devel at lists.andrew.cmu.edu 
instead of cyrus-bugzilla at lists.andrew.cmu.edu?

Thanks,

Dave
-- 
Dave McMurtrie, SPE
Email Systems Team Leader
Carnegie Mellon University,
Computing Services