From jgallicc at andrew.cmu.edu Tue Jun 1 15:45:06 2021 From: jgallicc at andrew.cmu.edu (James Gallicchio) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 15:45:06 -0400 Subject: 2021-22 Academic Calendar - "Town Hall"? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi again everyone, I finally have a meeting scheduled with the provost for tomorrow morning, 8:30-45am (... yup, 15 minutes...). To make sure we're all on the same page before that meeting, I'm gonna be available *today, 8-9pm* at this meeting link https://cmu.zoom.us/j/3575432412 to discuss what I will bring up tomorrow. I mostly want answers to two questions. 1. *Why was the semester length changed?* We've heard many different reasons, none of which are strong justifications for the change: - Desire for longer winter break - Advisors & other staff feeling pressure to work on Christmas - Vague COVID restrictions - Vague legal requirements 2. *How is the university going to communicate this change to students, parents, and faculty?* Students & parents have a right to know this change is happening, and faculty *need to know* in order to adjust curricula well in advance of the start of the fall semester. Also, of the 60ish who responded to the last poll I sent out, ~85% said that we should propose moving the start of Spring 2022 back a week. So I will bring that up with the provost as an alternative calendar. See some of you this evening, and hopefully I will have more to share after tomorrow morning. -James -- *James Gallicchio* BS Candidate | Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University | Class of 2023 jamesgallicchio at gmail.com US C: +1 (856) 994-5658 LinkedIn | Facebook -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jgallicc at andrew.cmu.edu Tue Jun 1 16:04:49 2021 From: jgallicc at andrew.cmu.edu (James Gallicchio) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 16:04:49 -0400 Subject: 2021-22 Academic Calendar - "Town Hall"? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Oh, just to clarify, that's 8-9pm EDT, i.e. in about 4 hours. Apologies for the short notice and for the confusion! :-( On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 3:45 PM James Gallicchio wrote: > Hi again everyone, > > I finally have a meeting scheduled with the provost for tomorrow morning, > 8:30-45am (... yup, 15 minutes...). > > To make sure we're all on the same page before that meeting, I'm gonna be > available *today, 8-9pm* at this meeting link > https://cmu.zoom.us/j/3575432412 to discuss what I will bring up tomorrow. > > I mostly want answers to two questions. > > 1. *Why was the semester length changed?* We've heard many different > reasons, none of which are strong justifications for the change: > - Desire for longer winter break > - Advisors & other staff feeling pressure to work on Christmas > - Vague COVID restrictions > - Vague legal requirements > 2. *How is the university going to communicate this change to > students, parents, and faculty?* Students & parents have a right to > know this change is happening, and faculty *need to know* in order to > adjust curricula well in advance of the start of the fall semester. > > Also, of the 60ish who responded to the last poll I sent out, ~85% said > that we should propose moving the start of Spring 2022 back a week. So I > will bring that up with the provost as an alternative calendar. > > See some of you this evening, and hopefully I will have more to share > after tomorrow morning. > > -James > > -- > *James Gallicchio* > BS Candidate | Computer Science > Carnegie Mellon University | Class of 2023 > jamesgallicchio at gmail.com > US C: +1 (856) 994-5658 > LinkedIn | > Facebook > -- *James Gallicchio* BS Candidate | Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University | Class of 2023 jamesgallicchio at gmail.com US C: +1 (856) 994-5658 LinkedIn | Facebook -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jgallicc at andrew.cmu.edu Tue Jun 15 13:12:52 2021 From: jgallicc at andrew.cmu.edu (James Gallicchio) Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:12:52 -0400 Subject: 2021-22 Academic Calendar - Meeting w/ Provost Reflection Message-ID: Hi again all, This email has taken a while to write, because I haven't been sure what to say about the meeting with the provost regarding next year's academic calendar. *The TL;DR is that nothing has changed*. But if you want to dive into a bit more nuance, here's my major takeaways. *0) The calendar for next year is not going to change.* The committee had a choice: 15 week semesters with a short winter break, or 14 week semesters with a long winter break. Many universities with similar calendars chose a short winter break this year (see e.g. Pitt's calendar). The committee instead *chose to shorten our semesters*, and is sticking with that decision. *1) The provost believes moving to 14 week semesters could be beneficial to students.* I'm open to the idea, but I remain skeptical. Note: I like the chairs of the calendar committee and the provost. I do believe they are all working for students' best interest. So I am open to their thoughts here. There are also a number of students (about 1/5 of those surveyed) who would prefer shortened semesters, so that's a discussion I'm willing to have. Yet, in the 45 minutes we talked, I didn't really get a sense of what benefits they were referring to. So I remain skeptical. I'm following up on that question and will share any details I get. *2) The provost acknowledged some failure to communicate this experiment with the community.* I explained that many faculty appeared to not know of this change as late as April. I explained that many students, parents, and others in the community still do not know the university is making this change. I asked the provost to *bring attention to this experiment and take responsibility* for the decision. However, I have yet to see any action on this front. *3) The provost acknowledged and took some responsibility for not doing enough this past semester to help professors adapt to a shortened semester.* In particular I cited a lack of leadership on the question of whether to cut material from the standard 15 week curricula, and what material to cut. There was some disagreement on whether it is even necessary to cut material, but as with point 1 I am skeptical. The provost claimed to be sending an email last week with guidance and materials for professors to better prepare for the next year. He also said this communication would be made available to students. *I have not seen anything of the sort so far*. I'm asking a few professors if they have received any resources yet, and will also be following up with the provost. *Summary* The provost and calendar committee have a responsibility to explain their decisions, and to provide leadership in a vision for change. * We cannot do that work for them.* *What we can **do,* is bring attention to this experiment by talking to people in the community. *Explain to parents, friends, staff, alumni, etc. that the administration is running this experiment.* Ensure that everyone is expecting an explanation, since we all deserve one. Thank you, as always, for your time and attention. It is the only reason I'm still pushing against this door, almost three months in. Please email me with questions, comments, and suggestions for how else to move forward. I'll be sure to keep you all updated. Take care, James -- *James Gallicchio* BS Candidate | Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University | Class of 2023 jamesgallicchio at gmail.com US C: +1 (856) 994-5658 LinkedIn | Facebook -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: