[SCA-AE] ANNOUNCE: FW: [Announcements] "Same-Gender Consort Proposal" - Addendum

[Dani Zweig]

How about:
Each competitor must fight for a consort.  Both the competitor and the
consort must be insurable.  The Crowns may reject any entrants for any
reason or none.

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 10:51 AM, <arhylda at aol.com> wrote:

>
> Regardless of your thoughts on the premise of same-gender consorts, this
> 'new' wording is horrible. Can't we do better??
>
> Maria A.S.
>
>
> Each competitor in a Royal Lists must be fighting for a consort of the
> opposite
> ender.  Crowns may permit entry into the Royal Lists by same-gender
> couples.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ireland-delfs, Orilee <Orilee.Ireland-delfs at xerox.com>
> To: announcements <announcements at aethelmearc.org>
> Sent: Thu, Feb 2, 2012 10:03 am
> Subject: [SCA-AE] ANNOUNCE: FW: [Announcements] "Same-Gender Consort
> Proposal" - Addendum
>
>
> Keywords: AEnnouncements
> _______________________________________________________________________
> nnouncements at aethelmearc.org for announcements only.
> eplies and questions are sent to discussion at aethelmearc.org
> r directly to the person making the announcement.
> _______________________________________________________________________
> rom: announcements-bounces at lists.sca.org [mailto:
> announcements-bounces at lists.sca.org]
> n Behalf Of ea at sca.org
> ent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:30 PM
> o: announcements at lists.sca.org
> ubject: [Announcements] "Same-Gender Consort Proposal" - Addendum
>
> When responding to the "Same-Gender Consort Proposal"
> re-posted below for your convenience)
> lease address your responses to
> omments at lists.sca.org <mailto:comments at lists.sca.org> .
> lso - Please remember to use the title
> Same-Gender Consort Proposal" in the Subject line.
> hank you!
> -------------------------------
>
> At the Oct 2011 Board meeting, in response to a formal request from An Tir
> and a
> ubstantial amount of related correspondence from our membership, we
> committed
> o crafting proposed language to allow same-gender consorts at the
> Crown/Coronet
> ist level to send out for commentary. This topic is clearly emotionally
> charged
> or many people, whether for or against the change. We do not have clear
> irection from a majority of participants based on either the Census data
> or the
> orrespondence received to date.
> The Board therefore solicits commentary on the following potential language
> hange to its governing documents in hopes of eliciting commentary and
> direction
> rom the membership:
> Current language:
> Each competitor in a Royal Lists must be fighting for a consort of the
> opposite
> ender.
> Proposed Language:
> Each competitor in a Royal Lists must be fighting for a consort of the
> opposite
> ender.  Crowns may permit entry into the Royal Lists by same-gender
> couples.
> Comments on this proposal are due by April 1, 2012.
> Please use the title "Same-Gender Consort Proposal" in the Subject line.
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> ca-aethelmearc mailing list
> end general discussion email to discussion at aethelmearc.org to post to the
> list.
> mail Official announcements to announcements at aethelmearc.org .
> isit https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/sca-aethelmearc for:
> more info, archives, subscription changes, etc.
> hen replying to posts, you should remove excess quotage.
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Sca-aethelmearc mailing list
> Send general discussion email to discussion at aethelmearc.org to post to
> the list.
> Email Official announcements to announcements at aethelmearc.org .
> Visit https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/sca-aethelmearc for:
>  more info, archives, subscription changes, etc.
> When replying to posts, you should remove excess quotage.
> _________________________________________________________________________
>