[SCA-AE] Change in Corpora Proposed

[fridrikr at rochester.rr.com]

Seems to me that such a lase would produce only a minor headache, as would a lapse of a day or so.  But the Board feels otherwise, as in the Middle Kingdom snafu this past year.  It created HUGE messes of hair-pulling, shirt-rending, and hullabaloo-raising on lists throughout the Known World.

Far as I'm concerned, I take the standard attitude we have at our business, "Anything can be fixed...."  So can such a lapse.  But, as I say, the BoD feels otherwise.

Fridrikr, speaking as a private citizen.


---- Robinson Neidhardt <robinson at clandiarmat.com> wrote: 
> Quick Question.
> 
> As Royalty are officers of SCA Inc. - would any decisions that they made
> while non-members - actually have any legal standing?  I raise this point -
> as since it is required by our policies - then any appeal would first have
> to look at the actual letter of the policies to see if it was followed. 
> 
> If so - then even a 1 hour lapse - if any decisions (such as a banishing)
> made within that hour - are null and void.  And - if it is discovered that
> there was a discrepancy in membership times - then it would need to be
> proven that no decisions were made with in that time period.
> 
> Consider the paper work nightmare.
> 
> Just pointing out the "big picture" - as rules are usually created due to
> big picture issues.
> 
> Yours in Service,
> 
> Eoghan Rorikson
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Sca-aethelmearc mailing list
> Send general discussion email to discussion at aethelmearc.org to post to the list.
> Email Official announcements to announcements at aethelmearc.org .
> Visit https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/sca-aethelmearc for:
>  more info, archives, subscription changes, etc.
> When replying to posts, you should remove excess quotage.
> _________________________________________________________________________