[SCA-AE] Peer Density/Dispersal was Peerage

[Thomas Ireland-Delfs]

Now, that does NOT follow.  At all.  Mainly because the population of a
MUNDANE area does not translate to population of SCAdians.  Nor to
experience.  The relationship cannot be justified.

:FRIDRIKR
grasgarðr dvergr
siginn ok glotti landvarnarmodr
non verba, acta
Don't sweat the small stuff, Gnomes for example. - DorkTowers



-----Original Message-----
From: sca-aethelmearc-bounces at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
[mailto:sca-aethelmearc-bounces at lists.andrew.cmu.edu] On Behalf Of Rob
Baldassano
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 3:54 PM
To: discussion at aethelmearc.org
Subject: Re: [SCA-AE] Peer Density/Dispersal was Peerage

OK, 
   
  WIth Scranton being in the 5th place of your list...
  wow that is disproportional. Barony Endless Hills based on the
commentary earlier should have the 5th largest population of Peers in
the kingdom. 
   
  Not that I am complaining, as I enjoy he activities I get to go to
here in Endless Hills regardless of peerage presence. 
   
  Just observing. 
  --Eirik