[SCA-AE] looking for some combat archers that shot at pennsic

[Taranach]

is there a specific reason why a sturdier 160 psi bolt would fail 
inspection? I know darn well that it has nothing to do with flexibility 
or collapsibility as the normal siloflex is very rigid.

Could it have been over some weight limit? I would like to know how 
something that would appear to be more safe (less likely to break) as 
well as more durable fails to meet an inspection standard.

I guess it is just the engineering in me...

Taranach

Tessa wrote:
> Greetings!
> 
> I know a couple of Our combat archers had their bolts failed because they
> were 160 psi, instead of 100 psi.  One of the inspecting marshals, Hugh
> Prescott from Calontir, feeling bad because he had to fail them