[SCA-AE] (no subject)

[Vladimir]

Thank you for the clarification,  it was rather pointed, but accurate.
Vladimir
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "William Rouse" <willemmaclear at hotmail.com>
To: <discussion at aethelmearc.org>
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 9:54 AM
Subject: [SCA-AE] (no subject)


> Maybe where you were from it was,  but it is a recent addition to the
> marshal's handbook.  Which is why we need more clarification on the
ruling.
> I the November 2000 edition (what we were using before august 2006)
section
> VI subsection 6 paragraph A states that shield with padding under the
elbow
> is enough protection.
> In the August 2006 revision the language has been changed to specifically
> state that shields are not acceptable. I have both editions in front of me
> right now.
> Either your requirement was a regionalism, or you sir have been incorrect
> for 6 out of 15 years.
>
> Willem Mac Lear
>
> Region One Marhsal
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get FREE company branded e-mail accounts and business Web site from
> Microsoft Office Live
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/mcrssaub0050001411mrt/direct/01/
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Sca-aethelmearc mailing list
> Send general discussion email to discussion at aethelmearc.org to post to the
list.
> Email Official annoucements to annoucements at aethelmearc.org .
> Visit https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/sca-aethelmearc for:
>  more info, archives, subscription changes, etc.
> When replying to posts, you should remove excess quotage.
> _________________________________________________________________________
>
>