<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div>On Thu, Mar 5, 2015, at 05:10 AM, Andres Tarallo wrote:<br></div>
<blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div><div> </div>
<div defang_data-gmailquote="yes"><div>2015-03-04 14:22 GMT-02:00 Shaheen Bakhtiar <span dir="ltr"><<a defang_rel="noreferrer" href="mailto:shashaness@hotmail.com" target="_blank">shashaness@hotmail.com</a>></span>:<br></div>
<blockquote defang_data-gmailquote="yes" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Not sure what the size the user base is, but one strategy that helps cleanup the mail boxes in the process, is to simply leave the old mail server in place, create new accounts on each client to the new server, and put out a memo stating that the old server will be up for X months, showing users how to drag-n-drop the old email they need/want to the new server.<br></blockquote><div> </div>
<div>My IT manager won't stand this strategy. And my user base is no t very "tech savy". That's why we try to do things with little user interaction.<br></div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote><div> </div>
<div>No matter what solution you choose, everybody's email is going to have to resync, because you won't be able to keep the same UIDVALIDITY on your folders. One advantage of staying with Cyrus is that you can keep UIDVALIDITY.<br></div>
<div> </div>
<div>It's true that we don't have things like AD integration. That's on the goals for version 3.0, which we're hoping to release in July. I'd be interested in knowing what else is dragging you away from Cyrus.<br></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Regards,<br></div>
<div><br>Bron.<br></div>
<div> </div>
<div>-- <br></div>
<div>Bron Gondwana<br></div>
<div id="sig567075"><div class="signature">brong@fastmail.fm<br></div>
<div class="signature"> </div>
</div>
<div> </div>
</body>
</html>