<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-03-04 19:59 GMT-02:00 Bron Gondwana <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:brong@fastmail.fm" target="_blank">brong@fastmail.fm</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><u></u>
<div><div><div class="h5"><div>On Thu, Mar 5, 2015, at 05:10 AM, Andres Tarallo wrote:<br></div>
<blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div><div> </div> </div></div></blockquote>
</div></div><div>No matter what solution you choose, everybody's email is going to have to resync, because you won't be able to keep the same UIDVALIDITY on your folders. One advantage of staying with Cyrus is that you can keep UIDVALIDITY.<br></div>
<div> </div>
<div>It's true that we don't have things like AD integration. That's on the goals for version 3.0, which we're hoping to release in July. I'd be interested in knowing what else is dragging you away from Cyrus.<br></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Regards,<br></div>
<div><br>Bron.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br></font></span></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<div> </div></font></span></div></blockquote><br></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">My manager is interested in losing old mails. He is aware that there might be issues, that the migration won't be unnoticed. <br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">I'm not dragging away from Cyrus specifically. We're leaving behind a tailor made solution, that cyrus happens to be one of it's parts. The great issue with that solution is that our less skilled IT workers aren't capable of doing many things. we choose zimbra mostly because of the admin interface, that is web based. Many admin tasks are accomplished there. <br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">I don't find fair to compare zimbra against cyrus. Is like comparing a petrol (4 stroke) engine against a brand new car, with tank filled and ready to ride. <br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Andrés <br></div></div>