<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div>On Thu, Oct 23, 2014, at 09:03 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:<br></div>
<blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div>On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Bron Gondwana <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:brong@fastmail.fm" target="_blank">brong@fastmail.fm</a>></span> wrote:<br></div>
<div><div defang_data-gmailquote="yes"><blockquote defang_data-gmailquote="yes" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><u></u><br></div>
<div><div><span class=""><div>On Thu, Oct 23, 2014, at 08:55 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:<br></div>
</span><br></div>
<blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><span class=""><div>On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Bron Gondwana <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:brong@fastmail.fm" target="_blank">brong@fastmail.fm</a>></span> wrote:<br></div>
</span><span class=""><div><div><div> </div>
<div>We only set quotas on individual mailboxes so that wouldn't be a problem. We also don't have sieve scripts except per-mailbox, so ditto there.<br></div>
</div>
</div>
</span><br></div>
</blockquote><div> </div>
<div>Sounds like you'll be fine.<br></div>
<div><span class=""><div> </div>
<blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>I'm not quite clear though about the global sharing thing. Does this mean, for example, that if one user wants to share a mailbox with another user, its name has to be unique on the entire system? We would have users who would want to only share with other users in their domain.<br></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote><div> </div>
</span><br></div>
<div>No, the per-user namespace is still fine - users can still share with other users in their own domain - just currently it is technically impossible to share with users in other domains right now - because the mailbox naming is not RFC compliant, so it's not compatible with real IMAP client, only with Cyrus management tools.<br></div>
<div><span class=""><div> </div>
<blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Since we support a single-realm Kerberos setup we only use usernames not email address login. Does that make any difference here since there appears to be an issue with the domain part?<br></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote><div> </div>
</span><br></div>
<div>There's nothing wrong with running without domains still - there would still be support for virtdomains: off, or else for a single defaultdomain: "<a href="http://example.com" target="_blank">example.com</a>" which would be appended/stripped as appropriate.<br></div>
<div><span class=""><div> </div>
</span><br></div>
</div>
</blockquote><div> </div>
<div>Great. I forgot to ask about unixheirarchysep. Does that mean that the default netnews "." way of doing things is going away? If so, will there be an easy way to convert? <br></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote><div> </div>
<div>Yeah, I'm afraid so.<br></div>
<div> </div>
<div>It's going to kind of suck for FastMail customers as much as anyone actually - since that's what we use! But here's the thing:<br></div>
<div> </div>
<div>a) it will be possible to switch to the netnews way if you want<br></div>
<div>b) but if you have virtdomains AND netnews separator, then that will mean that you need to switch. Hopefully most clients will cope - I haven't tested it.<br></div>
<div> </div>
<div>If you DON'T have virtdomains, or the users are all in the default domain, then it will keep working just the same. I guess we could have a config option "strip domain if same" or something, and get the same display as what we have now despite the different representation internally. The only thing is, you _could_ share with users in other domains if you wanted.<br></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Bron.<br><br></div>
<div> </div>
<div id="sig567075"><div class="signature">--<br></div>
<div class="signature">Bron Gondwana<br></div>
<div class="signature">brong@fastmail.fm<br></div>
<div class="signature"> </div>
</div>
<div> </div>
</body>
</html>