Webmail -- What's recommended?

[James Satterfield]

Is there a sieve builder plugin for IMP?
I'm already heading down the road with IMP/Horde. About half way installed. 
Thus far, Horde has been quite simple. My biggest problems have been dealing 
with the FreeBSD ports. php4 in particular pissed me off to no end.
ALL_OPTIONS=    BCMATH BZIP2 CALENDAR CDB CRACK CTYPE CURL DBASE DBX DOMXML \
                DOMXSLT EXIF FILEPRO FRIBIDI FTP GD GDBM GETTEXT GMP HYPERWAVE 
\
                ICONV IMAP INTERBASE INIFILE MBSTRING MCAL MCVE MCRYPT MHASH \
                MIME MING MYSQL NCURSES OPENLDAP OPENSSL ORACLE OVERLOAD PCNTL 
\
                PCRE PDFLIB POSIX POSTGRESQL PSPELL READLINE RECODE SESSION \
                SHMOP SNMP SOCKETS SYBASEDB SYBASECT SYSVSEM SYSVSHM TOKENIZER 
\
                UNIXODBC WDDX XML XMLRPC XSLT YAZ YP ZIP ZLIB

.for opt in ${ALL_OPTIONS}
.if defined(WITH_${opt}) || defined(WITHOUT_${opt})
BATCH=          yes
*grumble* Sorry... Still venting over that.
Oh yeah. Back to IMP and Sieve.. Any such pluging/feature?

James.

On Tuesday 15 July 2003 12:02 pm, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> I don't want to get into a big feature comparison between Horde/IMP and
> other webmail software, but have you guys looked at the Horde projects
> website (http://www.horde.org/projects.php) lately?  There are a LOT of
> Horde modules out there.  We use the main ones here at OSU: IMP (mail),
> Turba (contacts), and Kronolith (calendar).
>
> I'll definately agree that setting it up right takes time and testing, but
> with that complexity comes a lot of flexibility.
>
> 	Andy
>
> PS - IMP has spell checking built in.
>
> On 15 Jul 2003, Richard Houston wrote:
> > I agree and lets not forget the huge list of plug-ins that can be
> > installed to further extend the already feature rich system.
> >
> > The spell checker plug in was a huge + for my users.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Rich
> >
> > On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 12:22, scott at ruralnetwork.net wrote:
> > > I used to think that IMP was the best choice, but now I think
> > > SquirrelMail has surpassed it - or if not, it soon will.  Tracking the
> > > two projects over time, SquirrelMail seems to have a much faster
> > > development model by being very open to code contributions and
> > > suggestions from outside developers. Now that it's included in the
> > > Redhat and Mandrake Linux distributions, I expect that SquirrelMail
> > > will gather even more developer mindshare.
> > >
> > >  --
> > > Scott Langley
> > > scott at ruralnetwork.net
> > > Systems Administrator
> > > Rural Network Services
> > >
> > > Ronen Amity writes:
> > > > Horde IMP is the best choise.
> > > >
> > > > At 05:48 PM 7/15/2003, David A Powicki wrote:
> > > >> I also recommend IMP.  It does have a steep learning curve, but once
> > > >> you figure out what is going on it is very powerful. It has a number
> > > >> of great features for a web-based mail client and with the
> > > >> additional applications in  the Horde framework you have the
> > > >> potential for a Portal application.
> > > >>
> > > >> We support ~7K users logged in per day two on dual PIII systems.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> David Powicki           Network Analyst      OIT Network Services
> > > >> Voice: 413.545.1605  Fax: 413.545.3203    University of
> > > >> Massachusetts email: dpowicki at nic.umass.edu               Amherst,
> > > >> MA 01003-4640
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Etienne Goyer wrote:
> > > >> > I love IMP.  It's very flexible and have a ton of features.  But,
> > > >> > as somebody else mentioned, it's a pain to configure.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 03:57:07PM -0700, James Satterfield wrote:
> > > >> > > What webmail frontend would you all recommend?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > James.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > Etienne Goyer                    Linux Québec Technologies Inc.
> > > >> > http://www.LinuxQuebec.com       etienne.goyer at linuxquebec.com
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Richard Houston
> >
> > R.L.H. Consulting
> > 204-255-5135
> > www.rlhc.net