PostgreSQL backend: a waste of time?
Valery.Brasseur at atosorigin.com
Tue Nov 26 03:35:25 EST 2002
for those who are interrested here is a patch for Mysql as a backend.
warning, it's a developpment version for now.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noll Janos [mailto:johnzero at johnzero.hu]
> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 4:36 PM
> To: info-cyrus at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
> Subject: RE: PostgreSQL backend: a waste of time?
> I think that's a very good idea, but we found that MySQL is
> much faster
> than Postgres, when there are no complex queries (this is the
> case here),
> so it might be a better idea to use MySQL.
> On 25-Nov-2002 Nicola Ranaldo wrote:
> > Due to our historical problems using BerkeleyDB4 over True64Unix I'm
> > coding a PostgreSQL backend.
> > It's in alpha stage and seems to work fine over an our production
> > server
> > with about 7500 mailboxes.
> > Cyrus.log is DBERROR free, and users do not report any problem.
> > Access to mboxlist is about 5 time faster then with BerkeleyDB4.
> > If the cyrus community is interested in this little piece of code (i
> > don't
> > know due to presence of skiplist backend) we can start a thread now!
> | Noll Janos <johnzero at johnzero.hu> | http://www.johnzero.hu |
> | "Expect the unexpected!" | ICQ# 4547866 | Be free! |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 18620 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/private/info-cyrus/attachments/20021126/8d064ad8/cyrus-imapd-2.1.9-mysql.obj
More information about the Info-cyrus