<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Oops! My bad! I was looking at the cyrus-sasl repo, which has it's
own doc branch, and took that to be the cyrus-sasl documentation.
Upon further review, that seems to be mostly the supporting RFC
data.<br>
<br>
My apologies for the snap-answer. I've spent so much time buried in
cyrus-docs, I somehow managed to miss this.<br>
-nic<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 02/15/2016 07:14 PM, ellie timoney
via Cyrus-devel wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1455585286.2821845.522208962.65F59C01@webmail.messagingengine.com"
type="cite">
<title></title>
<div>But the cyrus-docs repository appears (at a superficial
glance) to contain SASL docs? So merging it wholesale into the
cyrus-imapd repository, especially in a way that obsoletes or
removes the cyrus-docs repository, could have ramifications<br>
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>On Tue, Feb 16, 2016, at 12:08 PM, Nic Bernstein via
Cyrus-devel wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>The <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://git.cyrus.foundation/diffusion/S/">cyrus-sasl</a>
software and documentation is in a wholly separate repository,
and should not be in any way affected by what happens with the
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://git.cyrus.foundation/diffusion/D/">cyrus-docs</a>
and <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://git.cyrus.foundation/diffusion/I/">cyrus-imapd</a>
repositories.<br>
</div>
<div> -nic<br>
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>On 02/15/2016 06:53 PM, ellie timoney via Cyrus-devel
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:1455584014.2818323.522192850.6F69E8FC@webmail.messagingengine.com">
<pre>Hmm. I don't know if/how this will affect SASL.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016, at 11:44 AM, Jan Parcel via Cyrus-devel wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>As a consumer, I'd like to say a couple of things.
1. I really REALLY don't want to see it become difficult, on my end, to
get the right versions of the libsasl2 docs on download. Apparently
quite a few pages disappeared between 1.5.28 and 2.1.26, but those pages
still appear in other places (including Solaris, possibly-corrected for
2.N.N) I don't view them as "part of" imap.
2. I've got some severe formatting problems displaying saslauthd(8) ,
which I hope is unique to that file and not a trend. saslauthd.8
appears to be pre-roff'd, it looks like the others are not.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<pre>--
Nic Bernstein <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:nic@onlight.com">nic@onlight.com</a>
Onlight Inc. <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.onlight.com">www.onlight.com</a>
6525 W Bluemound Rd., Ste 24 v. 414.272.4477
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53213-4073 f. 414.290.0335
</pre>
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Nic Bernstein <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:nic@onlight.com">nic@onlight.com</a>
Onlight Inc. <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.onlight.com">www.onlight.com</a>
6525 W Bluemound Rd., Ste 24 v. 414.272.4477
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53213-4073 f. 414.290.0335
</pre>
</body>
</html>